June 29, 2010

Q & A – Low fat or low calorie foods?

RSS

Filed under: diet — Tags: , , — Matt Schoeneberger M.S. @ 11:30 am



June 10, 2010

S.P.E.E.D. Q & A – How do I figure out how many calories I need to lose 10 lbs in 2 weeks?

Question:

Where can I find a table that tells me (according to height and weight), how many calories I should have each day?  If I wanted to lose 10 pounds in 2 months,  how many calories will I need to cut out to attain this goal?

In the Doing SPEED chapter, we outline our preferred method to find your caloric and macronutrient (Protein, Carbohydrate, Fat) intakes. Below is a link to a calculator I created that should make it even easier. Just plug-in your height, weight and age. Choose your sex and activity level. Then choose the degree of caloric restriction you’d like to use (20-40%) and the amount of carbohydrates you’d like to consume.

http://www.speedweightlossbook.com/doingspeed/0106/zr2kxy3/cminst.html

Figuring out the amount of calories you need to cut to lose 10 lbs. in 2 months is in one respect more complex, but in another very simple. Let me explain.

There are equations for figuring out the human metabolism that are complex and confusing. There are educated guesses as to how large a caloric deficit a person will need to lose a certain amount of weight in a certain period. These aspects, however, seem to be highly variable between different people which makes it all a complex guessing game.

Here’s where it gets easy. Cut calories. If you want, start by cutting 20%. If after a week or two that doesn’t work. Cut 30%. And then 40%. This all hinges, of course, upon your ability to KNOW, for sure, that you’re taking in a certain amount of calories.

Journal. Journal. Journal.

RSS

Filed under: diet — Tags: , — Matt Schoeneberger M.S. @ 12:52 pm



May 27, 2010

Chipotle Burrito Bowl – a great weight loss meal!

First I’d like to point Chipotle fans to www.chipotlefan.com. You want to know what Chipotle has to offer and how it will fit into your diet? This is the place to go.

On to the point… I’m sitting here eating a Chipotle burrito bowl with these ingredients:

black beans

guacamole

sour cream

steak

lettuce

cheese

tomato salsa

According to Chipotlefan.com, this burrito bowl breaks down like this:

Nutrition Facts
Amount Per Serving
Calories 705 Cal from Fat 360
% Daily Value*
Total Fat 39g 60%
Saturated Fat 16g 80%
Trans Fat 0g
Cholesterol 135mg 45%
Sodium 1440mg 60%
Total Carbs 39g 13%
Dietary Fiber 17g 68%
Sugars 9g
Protein 50g
Vitamin A 0% Vitamin C 0%
Calcium 0% Iron 0%
* Percent Daily Values are based on a 2,000 calorie diet. Your daily values may be higher or lower depending on your calorie needs.
INGREDIENTS: Tomato Salsa,Black Beans,Cheese,Sour Cream,Guacamole (4oz),Lettuce,Steak (4oz)

For many of you, this would count as two meals. Cut this in half and you’ve got about 11 net grams of carbohydrates (total minus fiber). This is also a near perfect breakdown of protein/carbohydrate/fat ratio for a S.P.E.E.D. plan:

Fat: 50%

Carbohydrates: 22%

Protein 28%

This is a perfect example of the fact that you don’t have to eat boring, bland food to lose weight. This is a great-tasting meal and it’s perfect for weight loss.

-Matt

P.S. – we have no affiliation with Chipotle, we just think they’re a pretty cool business that is doing some great things. Support them.

RSS

Filed under: diet, weight loss — Tags: , , — Matt Schoeneberger M.S. @ 12:49 pm



May 26, 2010

Emotional Eating Does Not Solve Problems

Yesterday, a client of mine stepped on the scale and didn’t like what she saw. She was frustrated, understandably so. I asked what happened since I saw her last and she said “I’ve been eating to solve all my problems.”

I responded, “Does that work?”

“No!”

This is where the lines blur between weight loss coach and life coach. In order to help my clients achieve long-term weight loss, I need to help them develop new habits in many areas of their lives, especially ones that relate to food in some way.

For this client, talking more about proteins, carbohydrates and fats or blathering on about cholesterol or caloric intake isn’t going to help. I need to find a way to help her see that eating does not solve problems (except maybe for hunger) and then find a way to help her apply that knowledge.

So, here’s an activity she will do during her next session.

1. Make a list of things that need to get done that you’ve been putting off.

2. Prioritize that list. The item that scares you the most goes at the top.

3. Do whatever it takes to cross that first item off. Force yourself to get it done.

4. The rest of the list looks easier in comparison, doesn’t it?

You see, people have a tendency to eat when they are avoiding an item on their to-do list. Don’t fall into that trap. Prioritize that list and recognize that you have the strength to tackle the hardest item on it. Even if you can’t complete the item right now for whatever reason, do as much as you can to get the ball rolling. Then once you’re done, go have a well-made, well-planned meal.

RSS

Filed under: diet — Tags: , , — Matt Schoeneberger M.S. @ 11:39 am



May 19, 2010

My Omelet

Hi everybody!

This is an omelet I made with fresh eggs from one of my clients. Thank you Ann!

It’s a little flat, I usually get them to puff up a little better, but I was in a hurry after a long day. I needed to eat and get to bed. It was still very tasty and very quick. Here’s the breakdown:

4 eggs

4 oz ham

3 oz cheese

830 calories, 59.4g fat, 4.1g carbohydrate, 66.9g protein

This may be too large for some of you reading this. But keep in mind if I’m only eating two meals/day, I would be under 1700 calories if both meals were of this size. For a male my size, that’s a weight loss plan!

Take notice I ate this at about 8:30 p.m. Break your preconceptions about what foods can be eaten at certain meals or certain times of day, and you’ll do much for your long-term success.

RSS

Filed under: Quick Thoughts, nutrition — Tags: , , — Matt Schoeneberger M.S. @ 7:33 am



May 13, 2010

Our interview by Jimmy Moore

Recently Jimmy Moore of livinlavidalowcarb.com interviewed Matt and I for one of his weekly podcasts. It is now available. Click below to listen.

RSS

Filed under: Uncategorized, weight loss — Tags: — Jeff Thiboutot M.S. @ 9:26 am



May 4, 2010

Losing body fat and getting toned

Just a little more about what it means to “get toned” and what that really means – losing body fat

RSS

Filed under: weight loss — Tags: , , — Matt Schoeneberger M.S. @ 9:07 am



April 26, 2010

How to get a toned midsection

We don’t like using the word toned, and I explain why in the video above. Let’s all try to avoid this word and say more specifically what we mean.

RSS

Filed under: Uncategorized, weight loss — Tags: — Matt Schoeneberger M.S. @ 9:27 am



April 15, 2010

Do I use my HR monitor or the elliptical to tell how many calories I’m burning?

We received this question from one of our readers:

So today I have been on the Elliptical machine for 30 minutes and according to the machine, I burnt 310 calories. According to my HRM, I burnt 384 calories.

Which one is the most accurate?

Is the HRM alone more accurate because it takes into account sitting Heart Rate?

Is the Heart Rate Monitor with the HRM ready cardio machine more accurate because it takes into account your Heart Rate plus actual speeds and levels worked?

Working out on LifeStride Ellipticals.

Good question. I’m assuming your goal is weight loss, since you’re counting calories, so I’ll answer the question from a weight loss perspective.

The difference between the two different readings you have is 74 calories, about as much as one of those little yogurts that are supposedly great for weight loss (they’re not). The difference is pretty much negligible and here’s why:

Let’s say you’re burning 350 calories in a workout like this and let’s assume you need to burn 3500 calories to lose 1 pound of fat. It would take you ten workouts like this to burn 1 pound of fat, all other things being equal. If you use the numbers you provided, it would take you about 11 and 9 workouts to burn 3500 calories for the 310 and 384 calorie workouts, respectively.

“But Matt, that’s not negligible at all! I’d need to do 2 extra workouts to lose 1 pound of fat!”

True, but you must keep in mind that those 74 calories can be blasted by a few extra nuts, one more bite of steak, a tablespoon more cream in your coffee… you get the idea. The amount of calories you burn during exercise is not something that is worth focusing on as an absolute measurement. However, I do feel that if you pick one method of measurement and use that as a tool of progress, it may be productive. In other words, if you choose the HRM and you burned 384 today, try to burn 400 tomorrow, and 415 the day after, and so on, regardless of what the absolute number is.

Overall, I think the HRM compatible machine will probably give you a more accurate number, but caloric estimations are not all that accurate even in tightly controlled settings. It’s a great question and sometimes these number games are fun to focus on because they increase motivation. Unfortunately, the calories in/calories out equation is so complex, I don’t feel a 74 calorie difference is worth sweating over. Remember, exercise to maintain muscle while dieting and then to reap the overall health benefits. If weight loss is your goal, focus on counting the calories that are going in… they’re far more important.

RSS

Filed under: Exercise, weight loss — Tags: , , — Matt Schoeneberger M.S. @ 10:27 am



April 14, 2010

Dr. Mercola’s Muscle Metabolism Mistake

Dr. Mercola recently published this article on his site. He starts by discussing new research regarding meal frequency and metabolism. The general sentiment of his article is that eating more often does not increase metabolism, but eating more frequently might help some people control hunger and, in turn, lead to weight loss.

Great! I agree.

Here’s where we part ways. Dr. Mercola goes on to state that exercise has been proven to raise metabolic rate and he continues by saying each pound of muscle burns 50-70 calories/day while fat burns nothing!

We discuss the science regarding his latter claim in our previous post
, Muscle Metabolism Myth

As for exercise raising the metabolism, Stiegler and Cunliffe wrote…

On combined aerobic and resistance training:

“However, considerable controversy remains about the degree of the influence of exercise on RMR [resting metabolic rate].”

On aerobic training alone:

“The impact of exercise intensity on FFM [fat free mass] and RMR [resting metabolic rate] warrants further evaluation.”

On exercise in general:

“Nonetheless, with regard to RMR [resting metabolic rate], the literature to date is still inconclusive, as exercise training has also been associated with reductions in RMR [resting metabolic rate].”

This hardly supports Dr. Mercola’s view that exercise raises the metabolism. Intensity and duration of exercise seem to be tied to its ability to affect metabolism, and most common exercisers are probably not reaching a level of either that would elicit a noticeable metabolism boost. When you take into consideration the other effects being studied, like an adaptive decrease in thermogenesis due to caloric restriction (metabolism slowing down when you eat less) and a reduction in spontaneous physical activity after exercise, the picture becomes less clear.

Our understanding of the calories in calories out equation is minimal, except for the basics. We know that if we’re not losing weight, then our calories in equal our calories out, plain and simple. Many things, it seems, can affect the ‘calories out’ side of the equation but people overlook the most obvious and most easily controllable variables in pursuit of other, less impactful ones.

Focus on what we do know. Eat a calorie-restricted, nutrient-dense diet. Use resistance training to maintain muscle. Perform other enjoyable forms of exercise for overall health.

-Matt

References:

Stiegler P, Cunliffe A. The role of diet and exercise for the maintenance of fat-free mass and resting metabolic rate during weight loss. Sports Medicine 2006; 36(3):239-262.

RSS

Filed under: Exercise, Research, Uncategorized, weight loss — Tags: , , — Matt Schoeneberger M.S. @ 9:37 am