April 14, 2010

Dr. Mercola’s Muscle Metabolism Mistake

Dr. Mercola recently published this article on his site. He starts by discussing new research regarding meal frequency and metabolism. The general sentiment of his article is that eating more often does not increase metabolism, but eating more frequently might help some people control hunger and, in turn, lead to weight loss.

Great! I agree.

Here’s where we part ways. Dr. Mercola goes on to state that exercise has been proven to raise metabolic rate and he continues by saying each pound of muscle burns 50-70 calories/day while fat burns nothing!

We discuss the science regarding his latter claim in our previous post
, Muscle Metabolism Myth

As for exercise raising the metabolism, Stiegler and Cunliffe wrote…

On combined aerobic and resistance training:

“However, considerable controversy remains about the degree of the influence of exercise on RMR [resting metabolic rate].”

On aerobic training alone:

“The impact of exercise intensity on FFM [fat free mass] and RMR [resting metabolic rate] warrants further evaluation.”

On exercise in general:

“Nonetheless, with regard to RMR [resting metabolic rate], the literature to date is still inconclusive, as exercise training has also been associated with reductions in RMR [resting metabolic rate].”

This hardly supports Dr. Mercola’s view that exercise raises the metabolism. Intensity and duration of exercise seem to be tied to its ability to affect metabolism, and most common exercisers are probably not reaching a level of either that would elicit a noticeable metabolism boost. When you take into consideration the other effects being studied, like an adaptive decrease in thermogenesis due to caloric restriction (metabolism slowing down when you eat less) and a reduction in spontaneous physical activity after exercise, the picture becomes less clear.

Our understanding of the calories in calories out equation is minimal, except for the basics. We know that if we’re not losing weight, then our calories in equal our calories out, plain and simple. Many things, it seems, can affect the ‘calories out’ side of the equation but people overlook the most obvious and most easily controllable variables in pursuit of other, less impactful ones.

Focus on what we do know. Eat a calorie-restricted, nutrient-dense diet. Use resistance training to maintain muscle. Perform other enjoyable forms of exercise for overall health.

-Matt

References:

Stiegler P, Cunliffe A. The role of diet and exercise for the maintenance of fat-free mass and resting metabolic rate during weight loss. Sports Medicine 2006; 36(3):239-262.

RSS

Filed under: Exercise, Research, Uncategorized, weight loss — Tags: , , — Matt Schoeneberger M.S. @ 9:37 am



April 30, 2009

Declining Metabolism With Age?

Myth: I am older so my metabolism has slowed down and it is harder to lose weight or maintain a desired weight

Fact: A fall in the metabolic rate through aging does occur when studied in large populations.  Reasons for this are not perfectly clear with some research suggesting that a loss of organ tissue and decreased brain glucose utilization are to blame.  In any case, regardless of the reason for the decline, it is estimated that the loss in metabolic rate is equal about 1-2% per decade, or a decline of 400 kcal/day from age 20 to 70. (Roberts)  This small decline is negligible and is no excuse for a rapidly expanding waistline.

Roberts SB, Rosenberg I. Nutrition and aging: Changes in the regulation of energy metabolism with aging. Physiol Rev. 2006;86(2):651-667.

Comment: Too many people try to blame their poor health or their unappealing body composition on an outside source instead of taking responsibility and making changes to their lifestyle.  Don’t make this mistake.  It may be hard to swallow, but 9 times out of 10 your weight gain is your fault.  You may not have done it purposely and you may not have realized you were responsible, but now you do.  If you’re concerned, start making changes.  If you don’t know where to start…. ask.

***This myth and others like it will be discussed in S.P.E.E.D. – the only wieght loss book worth reading.

RSS

Filed under: Research, aging, diet, fat loss, health, nutrition, weight loss — Tags: , , , — Matt Schoeneberger M.S. @ 2:13 pm



March 14, 2009

Muscle Metabolism Myth

A common thought in the health and fitness industry is “gain muscle and increase your metabolism”. This is technically true, but the effect is minimal. It has been estimated that 1 POUND of muscle will have a DAILY energy expenditure (BMR) of about 5 CALORIES (Wolfe, R. 2006). Therefore, even if someone was to gain 10 pounds of muscle they would only increase their BMR by 50 calories. However, it is not common for most people to gain this amount of muscle. Additionally, for people who are trying to lose weight, it doesn’t really work out this way. The reason that it will not actually increase their metabolism is because they will also be losing fat. Their fat loss will decrease their metabolic rate because fat has a metabolic rate of about 2 CALORIES per POUND (Wang, Z. et al). For example, if someone was to lose 20 lbs (a common goal) then their metabolic rate would drop by 40 cal/day and if they gained 5 lbs of muscle (a significant gain for most people on a weight loss program), resulting in an increase in metabolism of 25 cal/day, the end results would still be a net LOSS of BMR of 15/cal per day. I think this demonstrates that the common assumption of building muscle and revving up one’s metabolism, for most people, is not true. The true benefit of doing resistance training seems to be its’ ability to maintain the amount of muscle mass a person has and to promote the preferential breakdown/utilization of adipose tissue during a weight loss (calorie restricted) program (Bryner, et al). Resistance training also has many other potential benefits (Pollack, et al), but that is for another day.

References:

Bryner RW, Ullrich IH, Sauers J, Donley D, Hornsby G, Kolar M, Yeater R. (1999). Effects of resistance vs. aerobic training combined with an 800 calorie liquid diet on lean body mass and resting metabolic rate. J Am Coll Nutr. 18(2):115-21.

Pollack, M. & Vincent, K. (1999). Resistance training for health and disease. Med & Sci in Sports & Exer. Vol 31 (1): 10-45.

Wang, Z., Heshka, S., Ahang, K. Boozer, C.N., & Heymsfield, S.B. (2001). Resting energy expenditure: systematic organization and critique of prediction methods. Obesity Research, 9: 331-336.

Wolfe, R. (2006). The underappreciated role of muscle in health and disease. Am J Clin Nutr, 84: 475-482

RSS

Filed under: Exercise, health — Tags: , , — Matt Schoeneberger M.S. @ 5:52 pm