June 17, 2010

Priorities – What is really important to you?

We all have things we will do no matter what. We consider these things to be top priorities in our life.  For example, most people will take a shower daily, eat a few times a day, and go to work for 8 or more hours, the core necessities. But what about all the other stuff that ranks very high on the priority list or takes up the bulk of our time every day? The other things that you make sure you do on a daily, weekly, or monthly basis no matter what. Some examples include getting your haircut, having your nails done, playing Facebook games, watching certain TV shows or sporting events, going shopping, going out to dinner and so on. For many people these things will dominate their top priorities and will use up most of their available time. As fun and enjoyable as these things are, they typically do not contribute to achieving a high level of success in life. This does not mean that these activities have to be completely avoided. My point here is that many people have a priorities list that is dysfunctional. People tend to focus on, and succumb to, immediate gratification. There is no or little focus on the long-term benefits/consequences of their actions. The result of this type of thinking and behavior is very negative as is evidenced by the average economic and health status of many people. What can be done to improve this situation?

First, there are no shortcuts to success and happiness. It takes persistent effort. In fact, it is the effort that really gives us the deep feeling of accomplishment. Without some effort, sometimes a lot of effort, attaining some goal or reward will have little meaning and the potential high from achieving it will be fleeting.

All the information so far has been a build-up to a discussion of your nutrition and fitness priorities. However, the information can be applied to any behavior you would like to modify. It seems that many people, from my experience with many clients and the clinical research, put the nutrition and exercise aspects of their life, and therefore their health, low on their priority list. Or it may be high on the list but it easily gets bumped down by many other things. Why is this?

There are many reasons why a person does not make eating well and exercising regularly top priorities. A few of the reasons are legitimate, but most of them are poor reasons to justify the neglect. Regardless of the reasons, most people have the time to eat well and exercise a little. In fact, eating well will often take no more time than eating poorly. But, for arguments sake, let’s say it takes an extra 30 minutes a day to do it. Do you not have 30 more minutes in your day to be able to nourish your body properly? Again, this is about priorities. Do you need to watch 2 hours of TV a night? Do you need to surf the web for 2 hours a day? There is no doubt that you want to do these things. However, do these latter things really contribute to the “good life”?

When it comes to exercise, 30 minutes a few times a week can have significant health benefits. Exercising more can possibly be better, but for most people, who just want to be able to function well in daily life, hold-back some of the effects of aging, and be able to play with their kids or grandkids, then this amount of exercise can do the trick (more on the specific exercises in another article). Do you not have 90 minutes a week? Really, is this amount of time not available? I would guess it is, but you have probably scheduled other things to do, for right now, that you considered more important. This brings us back to priorities.

The first step to setting your priorities is to spend some time and figure out what YOU want. Think of this as your personal vision quest. Do YOU want to feel good, physically and mentally, most of the time? Do you want to feel comfortable with how you look? Do you want to be able to do some physical activities with friends and family? Do you want to increase your chances of living a long and healthy life? You need to really want these results and be able to envision the benefits you will receive from putting in a bit of time and effort. If you do not cultivate a deep, passionate, emotional feeling connected to the exercise and nutrition habits then the likelihood that you will change your priorities is unlikely, particularly for the long-term.

If you want to look and feel better then you need to prioritize your life in a way that will facilitate daily habits that will move you in that direction. There are many techniques that help can help your motivation levels and ability to stick to your plan, such as setting SMART goals, journaling, and getting a mentor or coach. For now focus on creating a compelling vision in your head and on paper. Huge time commitments are not needed, but consistent effort is. If YOU really want to change, then stop the excuses and begin prioritizing your time.

RSS

Filed under: health — Jeff Thiboutot M.S. @ 1:00 pm



December 29, 2009

Food, Inc. A documentary on food production – A must see

I rented Food Inc. this weekend. It’s a recent (2008) documentary on how most of the food in the U.S. is produced. I was aware of most of the information covered, but still found it educational. It definitely got me thinking again about the many problems with how food is typically produced and that it is clearly not the best method available. I would recommend everyone watch this video. I rented it @ Blockbuster. Let me know what you think of it after you watch it.

RSS

Filed under: Environmetn, Uncategorized, health — Tags: , — Jeff Thiboutot M.S. @ 4:12 pm



November 18, 2009

Alternate Day Fasting Succussful for Weight Loss and Heart Health

Research Review:

A study in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition shows some support for the ability of modified alternate day fasting (ADF) to facilitate weight loss and modify markers of heart health.

Subjects ate 25% of energy needs on fast days and ate ad libitum (at will) on alternate days. On fast days, subjects were instructed to consume all calories between noon and 2 p.m.  This pattern continued throughout the study. Subjects were also able to meet with a Registered Dietician (RD) (explains the horrible food choices they were provided on fasting days during the first 4-week period – chicken alfredo? really?) once per week.

The cool thing about the study’s design is that for 4 weeks, the subjects were provided a meal for each fast day, and for another 4 weeks were left to complete the program without prepared food. Adherence rates remained high for subjects who completed the study, which means ADF may be a valuable tool for weight loss and health in the real-world. One drawback was that 2 people withdrew from the study due to their inability to comply with the protocol – that’s 10% of the original subject pool. I guess ADF isn’t for everyone, although that’s not surprising.

Average weight loss over 10 wks (8 wks on weight loss diet – 2 on control diet) was about 5.8% or 5.6kg (12.3 lbs). Also decreasing were BMI, body fat percentage, total and LDL cholesterol, and triaglycerol levels. Systolic, but not diastolic, blood pressure was also lowered.

This study gives us a little more evidence that ADF or intermittent fasting (IF) might be a great tool for weight loss and health interventions. However, there are some drawbacks to this study. 20 subjects is a rather small sample size, so more studies with larger samples are a must.  The fact that subjects had weekly meetings with a coach (RD) most likely affected the adherence in a positive way. It would be interesting to see a study that compared an ADF plan with coaching to one without.

On a side note, the lead researcher Dr. Krista Varady commented on the subjects eating less than expected on ad libitum days and said “”I think it’s probably because their stomachs kind of shrunk.” Let’s get this straight. Stomachs don’t shrink. Feelings of satiety (fullness) change, but the physical size of the stomach does not shrink. Ugh… I can’t believe she said that.

Varady KA, Bhutani S, Church EC, Klempel MC. Short-term modified alternate-day fasting: a novel dietary strategy for weight loss and cardioprotectio in obese adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;90:1138-43.

Harding A. On-off fasting helps obese adults shed pounds. Reuters http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSTRE5AB4HM20091112

RSS

Filed under: Research, health, weight loss — Tags: , , , — Matt Schoeneberger M.S. @ 12:07 pm



November 10, 2009

What’s the deal with hot dogs?

When eating a low-carb diet it is useful to find quality protein sources that are quick and convenient, not to mention good for you. Surprisingly, there are certain types of hot dogs that qualify. You must be thinking “You must be kidding, hot dogs!?” Please read-on.

There is no doubt that the hot dogs are a ubiquitous food in the U.S. and so is the thought that eating hot dogs is unhealthy. However, it is not that simple and there are a number of misconceptions about hot dogs. Just in case you are wondering, we are not being paid by the national Hot Dog and Sausage Council (yes this is a real organization, see http://www.hot-dog.org/) to write this. There are typically three arguments used to support the idea that hot dogs are disgusting and unhealthy. These three arguments relates to; the quality of the meats used to make them, the amount of fat in them, and the preservatives, sodium nitrites or sodium nitrates, used in them.

Let’s first look at what hot dogs are made of. The following is a good overview of what hot dogs are made of, which is from http://www.sixwise.com/newsletters/06/10/11/what-is-really-in-a-hot-dog-and-how-unhealthy-are-they.htm

On to the million-dollar question: what are hot dogs made of? According to the National Hot Dog and Sausage Council:

“All hot dogs are cured and cooked sausages that consist of mainly pork, beef, chicken and turkey or a combination of meat and poultry. Meats used in hot dogs come from the muscle of the animal and    looks much like what you buy in the grocer’s case. Other ingredients include water, curing agents and spices, such as garlic, salt, sugar, ground mustard, nutmeg, coriander and white pepper.”

However, there are a couple of caveats. “Variety meats,” which include things like liver, kidneys and hearts, may be used in processed meats like hot dogs, but the U.S. Department of Agriculture requires that they be disclosed on the ingredient label as “with variety meats” or “with meat by-products.”

Further, watch out for statements like “made with mechanically separated meats (MSM).” Mechanically separated meat is “a paste-like and batter-like meat product produced by forcing bones, with attached edible meat, under high pressure through a sieve or similar device to separate the bone from the edible meat tissue,” according to the U.S. Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS).

Although the FSIS maintains that MSM are safe to eat, mechanically separated beef is no longer allowed in hot dogs or other processed meats (as of 2004) because of fears of mad cow disease. Hot dogs can contain no more than 20 percent mechanically separated pork, and any amount of mechanically separated chicken or turkey.

So if you’re looking for the purest franks, pick those that are labeled “all beef,” “all pork,” or “all chicken, turkey, etc.” Franks labeled in this way must be made with meat from a single species and do not include byproducts (but check the label anyway, just to be sure. Turkey and chicken franks, for instance, can include turkey or chicken meat and turkey or chicken skin and fat in proportion to a turkey or chicken carcass).

As you will see from the few brands highlighted below there is no problem with the quality of meats used. In fact, the organic grass-fed beef hot dogs are a very high quality meat which is better than any “regular” cut of meat you will get in almost any grocery store. Therefore, if you stick to the brands that use “all beef”, or “all chicken”, and particularly the organic or natural meats, there should be no concern with what the hot dogs are made from.

The second issue is the fat content of hot dogs. This really stems from the common, but misplaced fear about fats, particularly animal fats. There are many aspects of this issue but are beyond the scope of this article. For now, realize that a low-carb diet will be a higher fat diet, from both plants (avocados, walnuts, coconuts, etc.) and animals (beef, eggs, salmon, etc). Therefore, eating foods with fat in them is fine. The amount of fat in a particular hot dog will vary so you will need to read the nutrition facts label to know how much is in a specific one and how many you can eat to stay within your goal intake. Additionally, the grass-fed hot dogs will contain a good amount of omega-3 fats and CLA, which both have health and weight loss properties.

The third concern is the preservatives sodium nitrite or nitrates. These can lead to the formation of nitrosamines which are carcinogens (can produce cancer). These have been linked to cancers in the digestive tract. However, recent evidence for this connection has shown that typical intakes of these preservatives are not likely to lead to an increase in cancers (Powlson et al). Additional recent research is finding that food sources of nitrates and nitrites, particularly from vegetables, may be health promoting (Hord et al). There is more about this topic and, in fact, there have been a number of recent papers published on this topic so I will discuss this in greater detail at another time. For now, however, this topic is really not applicable if you eat hot dogs that are not preserved with sodium nitrite/nitrates. All of the following hot dog manufacturers listed below do not use this preservative. Therefore, these hot dogs do not contain nitrites or nitrates and the concern about ingesting cancer causing agents, which is not definitive anyway, is not a valid reason avoid eating this product.

Here are a few examples of healthy hot dogs; hopefully you no longer think that statement is an oxymoron.

Applegate Farms – The great orgahot dog applegatenic uncured hot dog

No nitrates or nitrites.

Made from 100% organic grass-fed and finished beef, these lean hot dogs are bursting with old-fashioned classic hot dog flavor—juicy, flavorful and delicious! These dogs have only 8 grams of fat compared to the average 15 grams in most brands, and because they’re made from grass-fed beef, they’re also high in omega-3 fatty acids (the good fat). Great on the grill or steamed on your stovetop any time you’re craving a taste of summer.

Ingredients:Organic Grass-Fed Beef, Water, Contains Less Than 2% Of The Following: Sea Salt, Organic Spices, Organic Garlic Powder, Organic Paprika, Celery Powder, Organic Onion, Lactic Acid Starter Culture (Not From Milk).

Let’s be Frank – Uncured Beef Frank

frank hot dogsNo nitrates or nitrites.

Made from 100% Grass-fed Beef

These snappy dogs are loaded with flavor, not junk! Using premium cuts from cattle raised on pasture in California (naturally high in healthy Omega 3 fatty acids!) and organic spices, we’ve crafted a delicious dog that’s lower in fat, calories and sodium than conventional franks. No nitrites, nitrates, hormones, or antibiotics, ever

Ingredients:Grass-fed beef, water, sea salt, organic evaporated cane juice, organic spice, organic garlic powder, natural flavor (celery powder, spice extract, paprika extract), spices, lactic acid starter culture, in a lamb casing.

Trader Joe’s – All Natural Uncured All Beef Hot Dogs

trader joes hot dogs

No nitrates or nitrites.

Ingredients: Beef, water, contains less than 2% of the following; allspice, celery juice powder, evaporated cane juice, garlic powder, ginger, honey, lactic acid starter culture, mustard, nutmeg, onion powder, paprika, pepper, sea salt.

In conclusion, the belief that all hot dogs are bad to eat is not supported by the evidence. If you eat a quality hot dog there seems to be no good reason that they cannot be part of a healthy diet, whether high-carb or low-carb. The benefit with a low-carb diet is that you can eat more of them! One way that Matt and I like them is lightly warmed-up with a bit of organic mustard and with a side of baby carrots or a small apple; how easy is that!

References:

Hord, N. et al (2009). Food sources of nitrates and nitrites: the physiological context for potential health benefits. Am J Clin Nutr; 90: 1-10.

Powlson, D. et al (2008). When does nitrate become a risk for humans?J Environ Qual; 37: 291-295.

RSS

Filed under: Research, diet, health — Tags: , , — Jeff Thiboutot M.S. @ 5:57 pm



October 21, 2009

What’s the deal with carrots?

Can or should you eat carrots on a low-carb diet? This will largely depend on how low you are keeping your carbs. If you are keeping them in the 20-30 g/day range (ketosis) then probably not, but if you are keeping them in the 70-80g./day range then it is probably fine to eat some. Here is the breakdown of half a bag of organic baby carrots, which equals 2½ servings:

Food

Serving size

Total Carbs

Fiber

Net Carbs

Protein

Fat

Baby carrots

½ bag (8 oz)

20

5

15

2.5

0

 As you can see, a fairly large serving of carrots does not have a high amount of useable carbohydrates. For comparison, a 1 cup (8oz) serving of brown rice would have about bugs bunny40 net carbs.

A final thing about carrots is how fast the carbs in them get digested. This is referring to its glycemic index (GI) rating, which for carrots is about 40. 1 This is a low to moderate ranking (rankings run from 20 to 100).  It is typically thought that carrots have a high GI, but recent research has over turned this. 1 As we mentioned in S.P.E.E.D., it is good, for weight loss and health, to keep the overall GI of your diet low. So, the conclusion here is that eating some carrots is okay as long you do not go over you specific carb intake goal.

 1-Brand-Miller, J. (2008). International tables of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2008. Diabetes Care; 31(12): 2281-283.

RSS

Filed under: diet, fat loss, health, weight loss — Jeff Thiboutot M.S. @ 12:00 pm



June 12, 2009

Introduction and 1st Chapter of S.P.E.E.D. Available…

…if you’re a fan of our Facebook page.

www.tinyurl.com/SPEEDonFacebook

We’ve decided to release the Introduction and 1st Chapter of our weight loss ebook early, before the rest is edited for release… for FREE! All you have to do is become a fan of our Facebook page. So, follow the link and become a fan. Tell your friends to become a fan as well!

You won’t believe what the first chapter has to say…

www.tinyurl.com/SPEEDonFacebook

RSS

Filed under: diet, fat loss, health, weight loss — Tags: , , , — Matt Schoeneberger M.S. @ 3:13 pm



May 14, 2009

Exercise Tip – Pick Multi-Joint Movements for Effecient Workouts

When exercising, pick movements that require the use of more than one joint.

For example, consider the bicep curl. Only the elbow is moving so only the muscles around the elbow are working through a range of motion. Now consider the row. The elbow is performing the same movement as in the bicep curl, called flexion (the wrist is getting closer to the shoulder) but at the same time the shoulder is moving as well. This exercise uses the muscles around the elbow as well as the muscles around the shoulder.

Multi-joint exercises: more work, less time.

RSS

Filed under: Exercise, Quick Thoughts, Uncategorized, health — Tags: , , , — Matt Schoeneberger M.S. @ 12:36 pm



April 30, 2009

Declining Metabolism With Age?

Myth: I am older so my metabolism has slowed down and it is harder to lose weight or maintain a desired weight

Fact: A fall in the metabolic rate through aging does occur when studied in large populations.  Reasons for this are not perfectly clear with some research suggesting that a loss of organ tissue and decreased brain glucose utilization are to blame.  In any case, regardless of the reason for the decline, it is estimated that the loss in metabolic rate is equal about 1-2% per decade, or a decline of 400 kcal/day from age 20 to 70. (Roberts)  This small decline is negligible and is no excuse for a rapidly expanding waistline.

Roberts SB, Rosenberg I. Nutrition and aging: Changes in the regulation of energy metabolism with aging. Physiol Rev. 2006;86(2):651-667.

Comment: Too many people try to blame their poor health or their unappealing body composition on an outside source instead of taking responsibility and making changes to their lifestyle.  Don’t make this mistake.  It may be hard to swallow, but 9 times out of 10 your weight gain is your fault.  You may not have done it purposely and you may not have realized you were responsible, but now you do.  If you’re concerned, start making changes.  If you don’t know where to start…. ask.

***This myth and others like it will be discussed in S.P.E.E.D. – the only wieght loss book worth reading.

RSS

Filed under: Research, aging, diet, fat loss, health, nutrition, weight loss — Tags: , , , — Matt Schoeneberger M.S. @ 2:13 pm



April 22, 2009

Meal Frequency – Boosting Your Metabolism: busted as promised

A few weeks back we sent out a challenge to our blog readers and newsletter subscribers to send us more traffic.  They’ve answered the call, partially.  Our blog traffic has gone up considerably, so we’d like to bust one of the myths we promised.  This is really like getting a sneak peak at one of the most interesting sections of S.P.E.E.D.

Myth: I have to eat many small meals throughout the day to “boost my metabolism”.

Fact: Meal frequency has been shown to increase weight loss in some studies, due mostly to curbing hunger and helping the subjects adhere to the diet and not due to an increase in metabolic rate. (Smeet) However, research shows that when eating diets essentially identical in calories either through three or one meal(s)/day, the 1 meal per day group showed positive changes in body composition compared to the 3 meals/day group. (Stote) Metabolic rate has been shown to be no different between feeding patterns of 7 and 2 meals/day. (Verboeket-Van De Venne) Intermittent fasting (reduced meal frequency) with caloric restriction has been shown to have positive effects on life span and brain chemistry. (Mattson) So, there is no need to eat 6+ meals/day and it might just be more health promoting to eat less frequently, like 2-4 meals/day.

Mattson, M. P. (2005). Energy intake, meal frequency, and health: A neurobiological perspective. Annual Review of Nutrition, 25, 237-260.

Smeets, A. J., & Westerterp-Plantenga, M. (2008). Acute effects on metabolism and appetite profile of one meal difference in the lower range of meal frequency. British Journal of Nutrition, 99(6), 1316-1321.

Stote, K. S., Baer, D. J., Spears, K., Paul, D. R., Harris, G. K., Rumpler, W. V., et al. (2007). A controlled trial of reduced meal frequency without caloric restriction in healthy, normal-weight, middle-aged adults. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 85(4), 981-988.

Verboeket-van de Venne, W. P., Westerterp, K. R., & Kester, A. D. (1993). Effect of the pattern of food intake on human energy metabolism. The British Journal of Nutrition, 70(1), 103-115.

RSS

Filed under: Research, diet, fat loss, health, nutrition — Matt Schoeneberger M.S. @ 10:09 am



March 23, 2009

Don’t Exercise, Play

Here’s a little something I wrote a while back.  More musing than anything….

Exercise is boring. Exercise is a waste of time.  Exercise is dying.  Exercise is dead.

Living a healthy lifestyle requires motivation.  It’s easy to slip into a cycle of laziness and gluttony, to let your health take a back seat to any number of other things.  With schedules full of responsibilities, full of chores and tasks, it can become daunting to add exercise to the list.  After all, we know we feel better when we exercise, but that fact alone is rarely enough to get us in the gym after a stressful, tiresome day.

The Common Cure for Motivation

What if there was a cure for this motivation problem?  What if we could simultaneously add joy, fitness and long-term health to our lives all while making it easier to find the motivation for gym-going?  Well the truth is we can, it just takes an adjustment in the way we approach exercise.

Exercise is a replacement for levels of activity our distant ancestors achieved through survival activities.  We used to need to hunt and gather, to build shelter, protect our families, and to travel long distances by foot.  Modern life has made these activities largely unnecessary, so we have invented ‘exercise’.  Our distant ancestors, however, partook in one form of activity that exists today, and has existed in many different species for many years; play.  We adapted play to our modern lifestyle and sport was born.  Sport, or play, is the key to our new motivation.

Sport

We all need heroes or role models to look up to.  As children, we often look to athletes as role models, as someone to model ourselves after, to make us work harder and excel in sports as well as other areas of our lives.  When we grow into adulthood, we often continue to admire sports figures.  We devote chunks of our time and energy into our fanaticism, all while letting our own athleticism slip away.  This is our mistake, our wrong turn on the path to health and happiness.  We stop playing.

The excitement we feel when watching one of our favorite sports teams or athletes compete is little compared to the feeling of our own involvement in competition.  The ‘butterflies’ prior to competition, the level of unparalleled focus during competition and the feeling of satisfaction after playing your hardest and knowing you performed to the best of your ability are rarely felt by many of us after childhood.  These feelings of accomplishment and involvement are important for health and happiness.  The athlete inside of us demands increased performance each time we compete and this is our new motivation, our source of drive.

Exercise is Dead

Exercise is an activity for regular people.  Exercise is regular people’s modern day replacement for survival activities of the past.  Exercise is their means to an end they know they need, but have no real desire to achieve.  Health alone is rarely a motivator.  We, as athletes, do not exercise.  Athletes train.

The difference may be undetectable to some, but training is worlds apart from exercising.  Training involves a focus, a drive, a desire that is fueled by the need for performance, for victory.  Training allows you to achieve feats you never thought possible and acquire confidence that carries over to all other aspects of your life.  Our natural competitiveness makes getting to the gym after a stressful, tiresome day a no-brainer, a non-decision.  We’re already there.  We’re athletes.  We train.

Becoming an Athlete

We, as adults, sit and remember the games we played as children and file these memories away, not realizing we could capture that excitement all over again.  There are recreational leagues for many sports and many age groups.  If we feel we’re not in shape to begin playing in a local league, our time in the gym should be focused on regaining the athleticism needed to compete at the most basic level, while adding sport-specific practice (i.e. shooting baskets for basketball) as part of our routine.  Once able to join the games, our training focus shifts to increasing performance for our sport and position.  Training continues as long as we improve, and for as long as we continue to play at any level.

Remember, we’re athletes.  We train.  Get to it.

New recreational sports league:

Phoenix Dodgeball

For more about training:

Online Personal Training

RSS

Filed under: Exercise, health — Tags: , , — Matt Schoeneberger M.S. @ 8:45 pm