HCG Challenge – Show us the quality evidence!
This is where the discussion on the validity and usefulness of the hormone HCG for weight loss will take place (the YouTube post area limitations make it very hard to make clear and thorough points). Our position is there is no quality evidence that the use of HCG increases fat loss, or helps maintain muscle tissue, or has any other physical or psychological benefits besides a placebo affect. This position is based on the number of studies that have been done on HCG. Although a number of studies may not be perfect, the weight of the evidence that is currently available supports our position on HCG. Therefore, we do not feel it is a useful tool for weight loss. A more complete discussion is in our HCG Report.
Our challenge, to anyone, is the following: “Show us the quality evidence that HCG works and how it works and we will change our position on the use of HCG for weight loss” For any practitioner that recommends this hormone, you should have this type of information at the tip of your fingers.
Fast Food Restaurants: Unjustly singled out as the primary cause of the weight crisis in the U.S.
It is a common belief that the increase in the availability and frequency of eating at fast food restaurants is a major cause of the current bodyweight and health crisis that is occurring in the U.S. For instance, Schlosser states “…it seems that wherever America’s fast food chains go, waistlines start expanding” (p.242) and a recent article by Craig Morgan in a local paper, which spurred me to write this article, stated “Fast foods’ [from fast food restaurants] ill effects on kids are well documented and real” (p.30). I will concede that fast food restaurants do have a number of items that can have a negative affect on health if eaten often. But, they do have a number of items that can fit into a fairly healthy diet and can actually be included in a weight loss diet. For a good rebuttal to Morgan Sperlock’s Super Size Me you should watch the documentary Fat Head by Tom Naughton. There is much more that could be said on these topics but that is outside the premise of this article. The premise of this article is that Fast Food Restaurants, such as McDonalds, Taco Bell, and others should not be singled out as the major players in the weight and health crises.
It is really the whole processed food industry that needs to be discussed if any “blame” is to be given out. You can get plenty of high sugar, processed “crap” in the grocery store, convenience store, movie theaters, and most any place that food is sold! Not to mention that it is likely that a person will eat MORE food when eating at family type restaurants than at a fast food restaurant. (Brownell, p.37) Even then there is still the case to be made for personal responsibility. Nobody is making you drink a 32 oz soda (has about 100 grams of sugar) or eat 4 donuts with a coffee that is loaded with sugar and so on. When it comes to kids, parents have a lot of control of what the kids will eat. The problem is that many parents eat poorly; therefore, they are setting a poor example and passing on these habits to their kids. How does a 5 year old purchase a sugar filled soda, or a tub of ice cream, or a jumbo bag of chips or a super size fry? There is no doubt that a lot of marketing and advertising practices are specifically aimed at modify eating behavior. It is clear that a majority of these ads are for products that are not very good for us, particularly in volume. Anyway, there are many reasons, (biological, psychological and social aspects as well as conflicting recommendations from experts and so forth), why people eat what they do and why they eat the amount they do.
Back to the discussion of whether Fast Food restaurants, specifically, are causing the weight problems. The evidence for this view is rather weak. Dr. Glassner, in The Gospel of Food, does a good job of discussing the validity of this issue as well as other hot topics related to food and health (Glassner, 2007). With respect to bodyweight, he states “only a small number of studies have attempted to test the fast-food hypothesis directly, and they have come up with mixed results” (Glassner, p.183). He discusses the details of a number of these papers. I too read these papers and found that the view that eating at fast food restaurants causes weight problems in a lot of people is not very convincing. For example, a 2001 paper in the International Journal of Obesity stated “Overweight status was not significantly associated with FFFRU [frequency of fast food restaurant use] among males and female. Interestingly, BMI was significantly lower among males who reported using fast food restaurants three or more times per week, compared to those reporting less frequent fast food restaurant use” (French et al, p.1828). Another paper on the subject states “…cross-sectional studies did not find any association between fast food restaurant use and bodyweight or body mass (BMI, in kg/m2) in children” (St-Onge et al, p.1069). This final quote, from the St.Onge et al paper, should be considered when trying to pin the blame on fast food restaurants:
Although longitudinal data are not available concerning increased fast food consumption and body weight changes, one can propose that increases in body weight and increases in fast food and snack consumption are concurrent events that potentially are causally related. However, any reference to causal relations should be made with extreme caution, given that no data are currently available to show such a relation (St-Onge et al, p.1069, emphasis added).
However, the situation is certainly not a bed of roses. For instance, one of the papers previously mentioned stated “fast food restaurant use was associated with greater intakes of soft drinks and lower intakes of fruit, vegetables, grains, and milk” (St-Onge et al, p.1069). Another paper had a similar conclusion “FFFRU is of concern because of its association with lower calcium intake and higher soft drink [non-diet] consumption” (French et al, p.1831). It is more likely that the increase in soft drink consumption, which is available everywhere, is playing a more significant role in the weight and health problems than does the eating at fast food restaurants (St-Onge et al; Bray et al; DiMeglio et al). So it is clear that eating at these types of establishments can negatively affect the quality of the diet. This would certainly not be beneficial for overall well-being. Again, poor eating habits occurs everywhere and poor quality foods, such as soda and deep-fried anything, are available everywhere.
It does seem clear that singling out fast food restaurants as a major cause of our current weight and health problems is not well supported and is a very big oversimplification of the problem. There are some good and bad aspects to this particular vehicle of food delivery. There are ways to dine at these facilities so that is fairly healthy. In fact, as Tom Naugton displayed in his documentary, you can actually lose weight while eating at these types of establishments daily. I will end with a fitting quote from Dr. Glassner “I come neither to praise fast food nor to bury it, only to question its easy portrayal as the root of all evil” (p.146). To make a truly educated decision, I would encourage everyone to start out by reading The Gospel of Food, Fast Food Nation, The Omnivores Dilemma, and watch Tom Naugton’s funny and informative documentary Fat Head.
References:
Bray, G. et al (2004). Consumption of high-fructose corn syrup in beverages may play a role in the epidemic of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr, 79: 537-543.
Brownell, K. & Horgen, KB. (2004). Food Fight: The inside story of the food industry, America’s obesity crisis, and what we can do about it. Chicago. Contemporary Books.
DiMeglio, DP. et al (2000). Liquid versus solid carbohydrates: effect on food intake and bodyweight. Inter J Obesity, 24: 794-800
French, SA. et al (2001). Fast food restaurant use among adolescents: associations with nutrient intake, food choices and behavioral and psychosocial variables. Inter J Obesity, 25: 1823-1833.
Glassner, B. (2007). The gospel of food. New York. Harper Collins.
Morgan, C. (2009, Dec, 2). Unhealthful fast food won’t be an option for my kids. Gilbert News.
Naughton, T. (2009) Fat Head. Morningstar Entertainiment.
Schlosser, E. (2002). Fast food nation: The dark side of the All-American meal. New York. Perennial.
St-Onge, MP. et al. (2003). Changes in childhood food consumption patterns: a cause for concern in light of increasing body weights. Am J Clin Nutr; 78: 1068-1073.
Filed under: diet, fat loss — Tags: diet, weight loss — Jeff Thiboutot M.S. @ 11:39 am
A 15 minute low-carb meal from Dana Carpender’s low-carb cookbook.
Here is great meal suggestion from Dana Carpenders 15 Minute Low-Carb Recipes book, which I picked-up this weekend. It’s a great resource for tasty and quick low-carb meals.
Apple Sausage Burgers
Preheat your electric grill (i.e., George Foreman grill) or outdoor grill.
Put the onion and apple in a food processor with the s-blade in place, and pulse until they’re chopped to a medium consistency. Add sausage, thyme, sage, and pepper, and pulse until it’s all well-blended.
Form into 4 burgers, and put them on the grill. Cook for 7 minutes or until the juices run clear,
Yield: 4 servings, each with 7 grams of carbohydrates and 1 gram of fiber, for a total of 6 grams of usable carbs and 20 grams of protein.
Can or should you eat carrots on a low-carb diet? This will largely depend on how low you are keeping your carbs. If you are keeping them in the 20-30 g/day range (ketosis) then probably not, but if you are keeping them in the 70-80g./day range then it is probably fine to eat some. Here is the breakdown of half a bag of organic baby carrots, which equals 2½ servings:
| Food |
Serving size |
Total Carbs |
Fiber |
Net Carbs |
Protein |
Fat |
| Baby carrots |
½ bag (8 oz) |
20 |
5 |
15 |
2.5 |
0 |
As you can see, a fairly large serving of carrots does not have a high amount of useable carbohydrates. For comparison, a 1 cup (8oz) serving of brown rice would have about
40 net carbs.
A final thing about carrots is how fast the carbs in them get digested. This is referring to its glycemic index (GI) rating, which for carrots is about 40. 1 This is a low to moderate ranking (rankings run from 20 to 100). It is typically thought that carrots have a high GI, but recent research has over turned this. 1 As we mentioned in S.P.E.E.D., it is good, for weight loss and health, to keep the overall GI of your diet low. So, the conclusion here is that eating some carrots is okay as long you do not go over you specific carb intake goal.
1-Brand-Miller, J. (2008). International tables of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2008. Diabetes Care; 31(12): 2281-283.
Filed under: diet, fat loss, health, weight loss — Jeff Thiboutot M.S. @ 12:00 pm
Yogurt, whey protein and a Clif bar: Another quick and fairly low carb meal.
Here is another quick meal; 1 cup organic whole milk plain yogurt (Trader Joes brand), 1 scoop of whey protein (Jay Robb brand), ½ of a blueberry crisp Clif bar adn 1tbs flax seed meal (I blended the protein powder and flax meal with the yogurt, and broke up the bar (1/2 the bar) into small pieces and through it into the mix). I had this for lunch today.
Here is the meal breakdown. It is a bit on the higher side for carbs, but for a low-carb, non-ketogenic eating style it should fit in fine.
| Food |
Protein(g) |
Net Carbs(g) |
Fats(g) |
Calories |
| ½ Clif bar (blueberry crisp) |
4.5 |
19 |
2.5 |
120 |
| 1 cup organic whole milk yogurt (Trader Joes) |
12 |
14 |
7 |
170 |
| 1 scoop whey protein (Jay Robb) |
25 |
1 |
0 |
110 |
| 1 tbs flax seed meal (Health from the Sun) |
1 |
0 |
3 |
37 |
|
Meal total |
42.5 |
34 |
12.5 |
437 |
An additional note about convenience; you could have made an additional serving of this (using the other ½ of the bar) and had it for another meal in the same day, dinner for instance. Having this twice in one day would give you about 68 grams of carbs. As long as your other meal (if you had one) is a low carb meal, say less than 10 grams (i.e., a big piece of grilled salmon and a big salad or a few cups of steamed broccoli with butter), your daily carb total would probably be in a good weight loss range. Having the same meal twice in one day is fine and it can make food preparation easier.
Filed under: fat loss, nutrition, weight loss — Tags: diet, weight loss — Jeff Thiboutot M.S. @ 5:07 pm
Grass-fed animals: Why what animals eat affects your health.
We mention in S.P.E.E.D. that there are weight loss and health benefits from ingesting a certain amount of omega 3 fats. However, we did not mention that grass fed cows can be a good source of omega 3’s. Grass-fed cows and their resulting milk and meat will also have more CLA (more about this nutrient in a latter post), vitamin A & E, and less overall fat per serving (not that we are advocating a low fat diet) than conventional (grain-fed) cows. There are also health benefits for the cows and some environmental benefits as well.
You can get grass-fed beef and dairy at some health food stores. There are also a number of places on the web. One good source that we have used for grass fed meats is U.S. Wellness Meats. A good directory for finding grass-fed animals, as well as the benefits of grass-feeding, is eatwild.com. The one drawback is that this type of meat and milk is more expensive. But, this is one place to spend a little extra if you can because the overall benefits to your health seem worth it. In fact, a recent review of this subject concluded:
“The scientific literature supports the hypothesis that grassfed beef contains higher proportions of healthful lipids [fats] and antioxidants important to human health as compared to conventional [grain-fed] beef.” (Abbott et al)
If you want to learn more about grass-fed animals see the reference paper listed as well as the www.eatwild.com website.
Reference:
Abbott, A. et al (n.d). Enhanced nutrient content of grass fed beef : Justification for health benefit label claim. Retrieved on October 1, 2009 from http://www.csuchico.edu/agr/grsfdbef/pdf/amberabbottgrassfedbeef.pdf
Filed under: diet, fat loss, weight loss — Tags: diet, nutrition, weight loss — Jeff Thiboutot M.S. @ 3:34 pm
Another low-carb meal for weight loss: Pass me the organic grass-fed hot dog
Here is a quick and simple low-carb meal. Two organic grass-fed hot dogs (Applegate Farms purchased @ Sprouts) with two sticks of mild cheddar cheese (Trader Joes) with 1 small apple. This took 2 minutes to prepare (heated-up the dogs, opened the cheese and washed the apple). Here is the nutrient breakdown.
| Food |
Protein |
Net Carbs |
Fats |
Calories |
|
2 – Organic grass-fed hot dogs |
14 |
0 |
16 |
220 |
| 2 – cheddar cheese sticks |
10 |
0 |
14 |
160 |
|
1 – small apple |
0 |
17 |
0 |
77 |
|
Meal totals |
24 |
17 |
30 |
457 |
This reminds me of a meal I had this weekend, bratwurst and sauerkraut; another very low-carb meal. Sauerkraut is a great low-carb dish (about 2 grams of net-carbs per cup) and it has some health promoting nutrients.
Filed under: body composition, diet, fat loss, nutrition — Tags: Low-carb, quick meals, weight loss — Jeff Thiboutot M.S. @ 5:31 pm
Trader Joe’s organic cottage cheese and a LARA bar: A quick and fairly low carb meal.
We mentioned a similar meal in the book, but because I (jeff) had this for lunch today, I though I would pass it along for a meal idea. You can eat healthy and low-carb with little effort or time. The LARA bars taste very good. My favorite flavors are the apple pie and the cinnamon roll. They are very simple bars; nuts, seeds, a little dried fruit and some spices. You can check them out @ http://www.larabar.com/ or pick some up @ Trader Joes or other health foods stores.
Here is the meal breakdown.
| Food |
Protein(g) |
Net Carbs(g) |
Fats(g) |
Calories |
| 1 LARA bar (apple pie) |
4 |
19 |
10 |
180 |
| 1 cup low fat cottage cheese (Trader Joes organic) |
26 |
8 |
5 |
200 |
| 1 tbs TJ’s Tuscon Italian |
0 |
2 |
3 |
40 |
|
Meal totals |
30 |
29 |
18 |
420 |
High Intensity Interval Training is a complicated issue. But, what it comes down to is the research is not sufficient enought to trumpet HIIT as the most effective exercise for fat loss purposes when combined with a calorie restricted diet. You’ll find out more about this in our weight loss ebook, S.P.E.E.D.
Filed under: Research, body composition, fat loss — Tags: fat loss, HIIT, weight loss — Matt Schoeneberger M.S. @ 2:35 pm
Conversation about HCG: Am I a Jerk?
I thought I would re-post a discussion that I engaged in over on the YouTube comments section after one of my video posts. I want to do this because I think some of the topics we discussed are important for potential HCG users (or anyone else) to understand. Also, I’d like to know if you think I handled the situation well. I’m passionate about delivering well-supported advice and sometimes I might get upset, so I want to make sure I’m remaining fairly inoffensive. So, tell me… am I a jerk?
The following discussion is taken from the YouTube comments section after my video post “Testimonial and Anecdotal Evidence and HCG.” My comments are blue and others’ red.
Tradeeagle: I’m sure you are well intentioned but you are ignoring that most people using HCG show the weight loss as a reduction of fat as measured by body fat %. This as compared to other quick weight loss diets or very low calorie diets without the benefit of HCG in which case you are right that the loss comes from the wrong places. You might want to read Dr Simeons’ “Pounds and Inches” before any other such postings with regard to HCG
Matt: I’ve read “Pounds and Inches”. It’s outdated. The terminology in it is no longer used. A much clearer understanding of body fat and its roles in the body has been accomplished since Simeons’ publication. Where is the proof for the HCG protocol’s effects on body fat percentage? There is none! Exercise has been shown to have a muscle-sparing effect on VLCDs, making HCG unnecessary even if it were effective. Please visit our blog for more information and read our special report.
-Matt
Tradeeagle: Hey Matt we all realize you have something to sell and I’m sure it’s effective. That’s fine But why put out misinformation on HCG which has been the answer for so many and about which you know nothing.
Matt: Tradeeagle,
I’m currently not selling anything. I am in the process of writing a book with a partner of mine. If you read our special report carefully, we’re happy for people who have seen results using the protocol, but there is no evidence to support that HCG does anything. There are no proposed mechanisms for HCG and its supposed effects that have any proof backing them up.
I know quite a bit about the human body and about HCG. I’m also dedicated to the use of PROVEN methods. Show me proof.
Tradeeagle: Please kindly direct us to the controlled trials to which you make reference. I assure from first hand knowledge that the weight loss on HCG is from fat not muscle and bone mass. Any weight loss is part water including your program’s. By the way I have been a weightlifter for 40 years, still am at 58. Again you may be right yours works fine good for sell a million books I doubt you have anything new to say but you’re wrong wrong wrong about HCG. Research for yourselves folks out there
Matt: Please download our free HCG report. All of the references are listed there. Feel free to contact me privately and I’ll email you the full text versions if you don’t have access to them.
I have not and will never disagree with SOME weight loss being water on any program! We’ve also stated, multiple times, that if controlled trials show a benefit to HCG we’ll talk about that just as much. There just hasn’t been any thus far.
Tradeeagle: I went through your website/blog. You really have nothing to add to what’s out there for decades desperate people will be swayed by you to pay for a book that is rehashing of rehashed ideas. What you are doing is straight from these idiot internet marketers. Next we will find your”book” is a clickbank product. I do not have a monetary interest in peolple using HCG. You are a guy using Youtube and HCG ascending popularity to sell a product at the expense of help to others from HCG use.
Matt: Our Bio-Psycho-Social approach has not been used frequently, if at all. Our HCG report is free. Our blog is free. Our book is not currently for sale. The intro and first chapter of the book will be made available free, to give an overview of the information contained in the book. People can hen decide to buy or not.
Please refrain from ad hominem attacks, I have not attacked you or anyone else personally.
Tradeeagle: You did engage in an insulting, condenscending answer on your blog to 1776 comments. You are a bully and your argument in answer to 1776 was incoherent and rambling. There isn’t the room for or time for any more of this. People will see this is all about you making money with an e book at some point. No argument from me that weight train is good for plenty but the idea that it is ever speedy is just crap. where is the double blind of your theory? No more please. CPS CET grow up.
Matt: I never once attacked 1776 as a person. I rebutted his/her arguments. I am not a bully. I have not once commented on any of the hundreds of videos that support HCG on youtube, because I was not invited to. I merely defended the ideas in my video.
I never said weight training was speedy, I said exercise helps target visceral fat and spares muscle, with references behind the statement. I’m truly sorry you’ve found my comments offensive but I won’t apologize for my stance on HCG. Take care.
Tradeeagle: I can’t resist. You say didn’t say it was speedy what the hell is the name of your blog? “SPEEDWeightLoss”. Make your comments that’s why there are comment areas. what you will get back is those hundreds of sincere people without a fimancial interest telling you there experience of fat loss. About the water loss with all weight loss. You are a scientist ? Every cell in the body requires some water in support and so when cells are gone or downsized that water, no longer necessary is eliminated.
I decided not to respond because the conversation was no longer progressing. So, this is where it ended. As members of the scientific community, we appreciate discussion because we know that questioning what we know is the only way we can learn more. We hope many people question the recommendations we make in our weight loss ebook, S.P.E.E.D. For now, I hope you can learn something from this discussion.
I was accused of being a buly. Am I a jerk?
Matt (more…)
Filed under: fat loss, weight loss — Tags: HCG, weight loss. fat loss — Matt Schoeneberger M.S. @ 4:09 pm